Home

The Crime

Nick

p.2

 

Forensics

p.2

p.3

Evidence

Hospital-photo

Fingerprints

Investigation

Deputy Pond p.2

p.3

Children

Coercion

Dinner at Grandparents

Broderick

Care-givers

Susan Staffel

p.2

 

Conversation

p.2

Trial

Attorney's

State-repression

Post-trial

Small-Sacrifices

Parole

Most Evil

 

Links:

manip-trial

dianedowns

or-judwatch

patrickcrusade

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jagger then approached the report of a man seen near the golf course on the day of the shootings, and who was seen carrying a shoulder bag.  He asked Pond if he had informed Sheriff Burks that he had eliminated this man as a suspect? Pond replied that he had told the Sheriff that he had never been able to find this suspect. The local 'Springfield News' however, had quoted Sheriff Burks claiming that they had indeed tracked down this man and eliminated him from the investigation. Obviously surprised at hearing this, Pond said he wasn't aware of it!.  But this wasn't an isolated example of Pond's behaviour in following up witness reports.  Jagger put it to him that there were many other similar instances of such procedure during his personal task in the investigation.  "You made reports of thirty to fifty at least?" Jagger asked him.  "Oh, yes, sure there were people who weren't contacted" he replied.

At this point Judge Foote, confused and irritated by Pond's explanation of why he had stopped looking for the man, intervened:

Judge Foote,  "Are you telling me then that at the time that you made those reports that the people described in those reports or the incidents described in those reports still, as far as you were concerned, may have substantiated the defendant's version of what happened?"

Sheriff Pond,  "At the time, I would have to assume, yes".

Pond then claimed that he only stopped following up leads on the orders of his sergeant.  This was around the middle of June.  And what this order clearly shows is that only 'three weeks' after the shootings.  The police had decided that Diane Downs was guilty.  Yet Deputy Pond had the audacity to complain of harassment from Diane and her father because they complained that nothing was being done to find the shooter!.  And nothing was being done.  This was confirmed by the District Attorney, Pat Horton, in an offhand remark to The Oregonian newspaper (June 10, 1983).  "The search for the bearded stranger", said the D.A., "is not very high on our priority list".  A claim he obviously didn't share, or forgot to inform Sheriff Burks about because the very next day Burks told the Eugene Register-Guard, "all leads received by detectives are being checked out and one officer has been assigned specifically to check leads concerning the stranger who Downs Downs says is responsible for the crime".

In Ponds second testimony the jury, although having been selected, were sent from the courtroom.  In this second encounter, Jagger attempted to prove that the material in Pond's reports were exculpatory and therefore should be shown to the Defense.  Similarly questioned as in his first testimony, Deputy Pond's memory once again seemed to conveniently desert him.  Trying to determine if Pond had even brought his reports to court Jagger asked him:

Jagger,  "Prior to coming here, you were asked to bring your reports, weren't you?".

Pond,  "No".

Jagger,  "I didn't ask you to bring those?".

Pond,   "Oh, yes, you did".

Jagger,  "OK, I'm someone, aren't I?".

Pond,  "Yes".

Jagger,  "And you didn't bring them or review them at all for this hearing?".

Pond,  "I brought the reports the State told me to bring".

Jagger,  "But not what I asked you to bring?"

Pond,  "No".

Following more "I don't recall" answers.  Jagger asked the Deputy if he knew that the subject matter of the examination was going to be dealing with these various reports.  Pond simply repeated that he only brought what the State had told him to bring.  Jagger appealed to Judge Foote that the witness was not answering the question.  Judge Foote agreed and told Pond to listen to the questions being asked and answer accordingly.  Jagger asked again about the reports he reduced to writing.  " I didn't bring them" Pond replied.  Exasperated, Jagger again appealed to Judge Foote to order Pond to comply with his request for him to produce the reports so that they will refresh his memory, adding that he had never encountered such behaviour from a witness in all his years of practice.  "If he uses it to refresh his recollection, said Judge Foote, "then you're entitled to see it".  To which Jagger replied..." I'll stipulate that I can't see it, that's fine, but I've never had a witness so ignorant of a case he investigated before in my entire life.  That's awesome". 

Judge Foote shared the Defesnse attorney's concerns and, to Hugi's dismay, voiced them saying...

"I am frankly getting more and more concerned about what's in those reports that this Deputy professes to have no recollection as to what's in there.  And I am frankly getting to the point where I think they ought to be brought into court and have the court read them".

 

back                                                                                    Top                                                                                 next